Quantitative Aptitude: Number Series 49 (based on IBPS PO Prelims)

Number Series asked IBPS PO Prelim 7 October 2017

These questions are based on Number Series asked in IBPS PO Prelims – Shift 1. Number Series asked IBPS PO Prelim 7 October 2017.

1-5 were asked in 1st shift

  1. 17, 98, 26, 89, 35, ?
    A) 80

    B) 85
    C) 76
    D) 99
    E) None of these
    View Answer
      Option A
    Pattern
    :
    +81, -72, +63, -54, +45
  2. 7, 4.5, 5.5, 12, 49, ?
    A) 289
    B) 345
    C) 393
    D) 276
    E) 309
    View Answer
      Option C
    Pattern
    :
    *0.5 + 1, *1 + 1, *2 + 2, *4 + 1, *8 + 1
  3. 2, 17, 89, 359, 1079, ?
    A) 2134
    B) 2159
    C) 2167
    D) 2155
    E) None of these
    View Answer
      Option B
    Pattern
    :
    *6 + 5, *5 + 4, *4 + 3, *3 + 2, *2 + 1
  4. 3, 5, 15, 45, 113, ?
    A) 216
    B) 209
    C) 299
    D) 265
    E) 243
    View Answer
      Option E
    Pattern
    :
    …..2………….10…..30…..68…..
    ….1^3 + 1……2^3 + 2,……..3^3 +3……..
  5. 3240, 540, 108, 27, ?, 4.5
    A) 8
    B) 11
    C) 10
    D) 9
    E) 12
    View Answer
      Option D
    Pattern
    :
    /6, /5, /4, /3, /2

Memory Based Questions asked in RRB Assistant Prelims on 24th September 2017

Click here for Memory Based Questions asked in RRB Assistant Prelims on 16th September 2017

Click here for New Pattern Questions for RRB PO Mains

Click here for SBI PO 2017 Memory Based Questions

Click here for Number Series Questions – Memory Based NICL AO, SBI PO



13 thoughts on “Quantitative Aptitude: Number Series 49 (based on IBPS PO Prelims)”

  1. 879590 124563I discovered your weblog web site internet site on the search engines and check several of your early posts. Always sustain up the really great operate. I lately additional increase Rss to my MSN News Reader. Seeking for toward reading significantly far more on your part later on! 598436

  2. Hey there just wanted to give you a quick heads up. The words in your post seem to be running off
    the screen in Safari. I’m not sure if this is a formatting issue or something to do with web browser compatibility but I
    thought I’d post to let you know. The style and design look great though!
    Hope you get the problem fixed soon. Thanks

Comments are closed.